On one hand there
is teaching, the conveying of
information from one individual to another, and then on the other hand there is
teaching with an impact, which passes
on a concrete concept that is readily available and utilized. Teaching
with an impact, in my opinion, is a technique that is developed. It is what I would like to refer to as Style.
Style is a tool that educators
utilize in order to convey what they, themselves, were taught as students to
their own students, but at the same time causes what is taught to be an
instinctive part of their everyday routine.
For English educators the information that should be taught are the tips
and tricks to composing a written piece that is both interactive and engaging
with its readers. Why would writing something interactive and engaging be important?
Writing something down solidifies ideas in the mind, and sometimes it also helps
organize ideas that are only floating in the conscious. Other than aiding students get that A on their report card, being able to
habitually and subconsciously write their ideas out will help them 1) Continue
to learn more about themselves and the world around them (the world is pretty
interesting), 2) Get into a place of higher learning to further their
education, 3) Find that delightful job they always aimed for, and 4) Be able to
take a break from their everyday routine and perhaps jolt down whatever they
want with the almighty pencil and paper.
An educator’s Style is the
difference between inspiring students with what we have to say and simply
hearing ourselves talk.
Donald Murray and
Tom Newkirk have both said “educators will often time say that writing is
either narrative, informative or argumentative. But writing
doesn’t have to be one or the other.” I
want to believe this. Writing should be
interchangeably narrative, informative or argumentative because speech and ideas in our minds are
interchangeably narrative, informative or argumentative. Both Murray
and Newkirk go on to explain that writing is typically taught in this
slice-and-dice fashion so that students will be able to formally learn what categories of writing there are. While this is all way and done, educators
later stages of a student’s career should be able to teach them that
interchangeability does exist and can be done. But sometimes, even with myself, those
educators that have the best of intentions don’t exactly stick in my mind. Their lesson plans soon dissipate into
blankness, alongside their name and teaching Style. For those educators
whose Style does stick with me, well,
they go on to influence how I perceive the world I live in and how I tend to
compose my writing. Because of their Style I analyze the way they used to
analyze, I develop and compose the way they develop and compose, and I write
according to how they writ and wrote. Thankfully for me, those educators taught me
how to be interchangeable in my writing.
It would be fair to say that Style
and the development of Style are
analogous to an educator’s Personality
and the development of an educator’s Personality. Those imprinted Personalities of my educators influence me, they help develop my
abilities as a writer, they cause me to enjoy in the art of writing, and they
remind me that outside of academic writing there is writing for fun.
Since having
arrived at Rhode Island College, I’ve met with and been given many resources in
as to what Style is and how to
develop it. Books by Donald Murray and
Tom Newkirk are great aides. Scholarly
journals in our college index JStor
will often time provide me insight into other students and educators that have
dealt with this very issue. And most
importantly in helping me grasp what exactly is Style are my professors, my peers and graduates from the FSED
program. So far, I’ve already secured
appointments with a recent graduate and friend James David Salisbury at the
Nathanial Green Middle School. His
interactive and engaging teaching Style
coincides with my own ideas in as to what would be my Style, so throughout the semester I will observe him and his
students. My professors and the
professors of my peers are future appointments I plan to make so that I can
observe them as well. Each and every
student at Rhode Island College have their favorite and their
I-would-rather-be-outside-than-in-here-for-two-hours professors, and it would
be very interesting to see exactly why that is.
Does the information stick with
them or does it freely and easily dissipate from their conscious? In learning what Style actually is, whether or not it really is a technique to developing an educator’s Personality or just something we’re
taught, I have hopes to utilizing it to influence and inspiring my
students. And perhaps I could also pass
it on to my fellows in the FSED program as well.
Bill, I'm intrigued by your research and I look forward to hearing more about it as you progress. I have the same desire to figure out what my mentors did well and carry these thoughts with me as I develop my own style. Your digital intro talks about endless possibilities, inspiration, and intellectual fulfillment, all thoughts which resonate with me! Thanks, Cindy.
ReplyDeleteBill, I am a little confused by your topic. Are you looking at writing styles or teaching styles in writing classes. Are you leaning toward a specific kind of learning style, or an incorporation of many different types. From what I see, the idea seems interesting. I look forward to seeing where you take it.
ReplyDelete