In this observation assignment, your goal is to
reverse-engineer a lesson plan. Watch the class, and write the lesson plan that
teacher is using.
Do this by OBSERVATION, even if the teacher is willing to
share their lesson plan with you. This is about improving your observation
skills, not getting ‘the answer’.
Lesson Plan Template for SED 406 and 407
part 1 = planning
|
||
Teacher
Candidate:
Joseph
Bonaldi
|
Subject:
English
|
Grade(s):
12th
Grade
|
Name of
Lesson:
|
||
Learning
Objective(s), including Bloom's taxonomic level: (label A, B, C, *D) *optional
Ss will
investigate select text from Lord of
the Flies in pairs of four, looking specifically for evidence which
proves a particular thesis which is included in the same packet as their
select LOTF text.
|
||
Student
Standards (GSE or/GLE or Common Core-in draft for math/science- list which):
Reading Standards for Literature 6-12
Key Ideas and Details Grades 11-12 Students
2. Determine two or more themes or central ideas of a text
and analyze their development over the course of the text, including how they
interact and build on one another to produce a complex account; provide an
objective summary of the text.
|
||
Teacher
Standards (professional society and/or NETS
and RIPTS-list which):
Standard 5
Teachers create instructional opportunity to encourage all
students’ development of critical thinking, problem solving, performance
skills, and literacy across content areas.
|
||
Rationale: Why this lesson? How does it fit into the
curriculum and context?
Is this
the introduction, conclusion, or somewhere in the middle of the unit of
instruction?
This lesson is successful in that it approaches the
students with their prior knowledge to the material. What the educator aims
to do is to have them go back into the text and reclaim what they’ve already
read in order to prove a set of information which reflects upon the text and
material.
|
||
Materials/Resources
needed, including technology:
Thesis packet, Select reading packet, highlights, pens,
pencils, allocated space to discuss with assigned groups
|
||
Accommodations
and Modifications (special needs and learning styles) For example: Dr. Kraus has poor
vision and needs written material to be at least 12 pt. font. He also reads two grade levels higher and
needs appropriate reading material.
Students are given extra sets of material upon require if
the select reading is not sufficient to complete the lesson. If students are unable to read the packets,
master copies and the Lord of the Flies
novel is readily available to also read.
|
||
What
content resources support this knowledge base? (list at least 2)
n/a
|
||
How
confident are you in this topic as you start this lesson?
Joseph Bonaldi researched and prepared numerous items in
order to create this lesson. When
asked whether or not he was confident, he responded “I only worry that I will
mumble my instructions, as I have a bad habit of speaking fast.”
|
Lesson
Plan Template
part 2 = action
|
|||||
Bell-ringer:
How will you get students seated, and ready for academic work? (without your voice)
Joseph gave “Discussion Leaders” the packets, listed with
who was in their group. When he
signaled, the leaders would seat themselves in difference sections of the
room and call out the name of their group members.
|
|||||
Anticipatory
Set: How will you introduce the material, interest the students, show
relevance of topic?
Joseph began the class by reviewing the material in LOTF and read an example of the type
of thesis he would have created from the material he reviewed.
|
|||||
Phase (change as needed)/Time
|
Teacher action
|
Student action
|
Questions/Assessments
|
||
e.g.
Intro/5 min.
|
Reviewed LOTF and read example of thesis
|
Followed along in
book and took notes
|
“How do you believe this proves the thesis?”
|
||
Presentation
or
Open-ended/
2 minutes
|
Passed out packets and exampled to class what was to be
done with packets and groups
|
Students reviewed notes and got prepared to move
|
|||
Guided
Practice or
Convergent/
15 minutes
|
Recollect pre-organized list of terms and thesis questions
and prepares to rebuttal student discussion
|
Students collected together and worked on the packets
together
|
|||
Closing/10
minutes (ran out of time)
|
Listened to each group and played devil’s advocate to
further critical thinking
|
Students selected key speaker to present findings, and
answered questions as the educator continued to listen to their weigh in
|
|||
HW/Application/
|
Finish reading and reviewing the deeper concepts found in
the end of LOTF
|
||||
Review and
Reflection: How will you review for students who are still having trouble?
Have students continue reading LOTF and answer in their reading journals this question “How will
information work to support that Piggy, Jack, or Ralph is fittest to the
leader?”
|
|||||
Extension:
What will you offer to students who have mastered this?
Ask the question “How could they have been a better leader
considering the events earlier in the book?” “What could they have done/not
done?”
|
|||||
*Closing: How will you review the material, and
draw conclusions? (may be listed above)
|
Lesson Plan Template
pt. 3 = reflection
|
|
WHAT?
|
What went
well? Students grasped and comprehended the
material rather quickly.
|
What area
of weakness needs addressing?
Instructions should have been louder and clearer. Some students struggled only because they
couldn’t hear the first set of instructions at the beginning of class.
|
|
Which
objectives were met? What is the evidence?
The singular objective was met, as each student was able
to pull rom their select text and support the thesis they were all
given. They were all able to also
infer on the future of the novel from the thesis’ and close reading of the
text.
|
|
Which
students did not meet objectives?
n/a
|
|
Was time
managed appropriately?
Discussion time could have skipped a few educator questions,
as the class ran out of time before the final group could answer said
question.
|
|
Did any
teacher mannerisms or actions detract from the lesson?
n/a
|
|
*What were
the strengths and weaknesses of classroom management?
The students were able to structure themselves in an
efficient manner. However, they
weren’t able to manage themselves very well after lunch time.
|
|
SO WHAT?
|
Was the
lesson engaging?
Yes, the lesson involved the students heavily in their
presentation to the class. It also
took a contribution from each student in order to effectively answer the
thesis questions.
|
*What did
I learn from my peer observation (address at least one aspect)
The educator could have been more clear and concise about
what he wanted from the student. Had
he spent more time on explaining, the students would have (in my opinion)
been able to pull apart the articles more in depth.
|
|
NOW WHAT?
|
How will
this experience influence your professional identity?
As a to-be student teacher, I am learning that students
really depend on the educator to guide them through the lesson. Simply throwing a set of instructions at
students, even if they are well-versed in the subject material, does not
guarantee a perfect, or give a satisfactory, outcome without a tad bit of
guidance.
|
How will
it influence how you plan/teach/assess in the future?
I will slow down my lessons and teach according to the way
I perceive my students understand me.
When I ask “Any questions?” I will still repeat myself once more to
make sure that the students comprehend and can process the information, and aren't simply too shy to ask.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment